People v. Franks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Franks

260 A.D.2d 313, 690 N.Y.S.2d 179

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D.2d 313 (People v. Franks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Franks, 260 A.D.2d 313, 690 N.Y.S.2d 179 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.), rendered June 20, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 10 to 20 years, 5 to 10 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. The jury could have reasonably concluded that defendant intentionally aided the codefendant in forcibly retaining the proceeds of their joint shoplifting. We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Lerner, Mazzarelli and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.), rendered June 20, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 10 to 20 years, 5 to 10 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. The jury could have reasonably concluded that defendant intentionally aided the codefendant in forcibly retaining the proceeds of their joint shoplifting. We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Lerner, Mazzarelli and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 313, 690 N.Y.S.2d 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-franks-nyappdiv-1999.