People v. Franklin
This text of 287 A.D.2d 649 (People v. Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered June 21, 2000, convicting him of criminally negligent homicide and assault in the third degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The trial court properly determined that, in making each of his Batson challenges (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79), the defendant failed to make the requisite prima facie showing of purposeful discrimination (see, People v Allen, 86 NY2d 101). In any event, the record supports the court’s conclusion that the prosecutor’s proffered justifications for each of the peremptory challenges, all of which were race-neutral, were not pretextual (see, People v Allen, supra, at 104).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; cf., People v Albert, 85 NY2d 851). Ritter, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
287 A.D.2d 649, 731 N.Y.S.2d 870, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-franklin-nyappdiv-2001.