People v. Frank T. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Frank T. C.

73 A.D.2d 936, 423 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9848

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 14, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 73 A.D.2d 936 (People v. Frank T. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Frank T. C., 73 A.D.2d 936, 423 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed June 22, 1979, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of four years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a period of imprisonment of 60 days and probation for an additional 4 years and 10 months. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, to fix the conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur; Mangano, J. P., dissents and votes to affirm the sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed June 22, 1979, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of four years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a period of imprisonment of 60 days and probation for an additional 4 years and 10 months. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, to fix the conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur; Mangano, J. P., dissents and votes to affirm the sentence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 A.D.2d 936, 423 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-frank-t-c-nyappdiv-1980.