People v. Franco

55 A.D.3d 319, 864 N.Y.S.2d 310
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), entered on or about June 5, 2007, which denied defendant’s motion to be resentenced under the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly recognized the degree of discretion it possessed (compare People v Arana, 32 AD3d 305 [2006]), and [320]*320providently exercised it. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determination that resentencing was not warranted, particularly in view of the serious aggravating factors surrounding the underlying crime (see e.g. People v Vasquez, 41 AD3d 111 [2007], lv dismissed 9 NY3d 870 [2007]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Sweeny, Catterson and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Franco, 55 A.D.3d 319, 864 N.Y.S.2d 310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

55 A.D.3d 319 (People v. Franco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Castillo
63 A.D.3d 641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)