People v. Franco

300 A.D.2d 674, 751 N.Y.S.2d 778
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Franco. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 A.D.3d 710

Opinion

—Appeal by the de[675]*675fendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blackburne, J.), rendered May 15, 2001, as amended May 18, 2001, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the photographic identification of the defendant by an undercover police officer was not unduly suggestive (see People v Blacknall, 216 AD2d 404).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J.P., Luciano, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Franco, 300 A.D.2d 674, 751 N.Y.S.2d 778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

300 A.D.2d 674 (People v. Franco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Blacknall
216 A.D.2d 404 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)