People v. Franco

38 A.D.2d 743, 329 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5540
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 24, 1972·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County, all rendered July 24, 1970, each convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Appeal held in abeyance pending proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: In our opinion, defendant’s commitment to Dannemora State Hospital after his guilty pleas and the sentencing, combined with his prior history of episodic mental illness and institutionalization, raises a question as to his competency at the time of those proceedings and he is entitled to a hearing thereon (People v. Lyall, 34 A D 2d 854; People v. Frampton, 31 A D 2d 551). [744]*744However, because defendant is still incarcerated in Dannemora State Hospital, the procedures outlined in People v. Aponte (28 N Y 2d 343, 350-351) must first be utilized. Accordingly, defendant may make application to the County Court, Clinton County, for a hearing to determine his current sanity. In the event he is found sane and capable of understanding the proceedings, the case should be transferred to the County Court, Suffolk County, for the hearing indicated in the paragraph just above (cf. People v. Frampton, supra). Rabin, P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Gulotta and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Franco, 38 A.D.2d 743, 329 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

38 A.D.2d 743 (People v. Franco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States ex rel. Franco v. Ternullo
413 F. Supp. 801 (S.D. New York, 1976)