People v. Francis

2021 NY Slip Op 03608, 195 A.D.3d 748, 145 N.Y.S.3d 353
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Francis. Read the opinion of the Court — 2018 NY Slip Op 5971
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 2021·No. 2019-02690·Published

Opinion

People v Francis (2021 NY Slip Op 03608)
People v Francis
2021 NY Slip Op 03608
Decided on June 9, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 9, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2019-02690
2019-02691
(Ind. No. 190/17, S.C.I. No. 196/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

John A. Francis, appellant.


Thomas N. N. Angell, Poughkeepsie, NY (Jennifer Burton of counsel), for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Peter M. Forman, J.), rendered January 24, 2019, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under Superior Court Information No. 196/18, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered January 24, 2019, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 190/17.

ORDERED that the judgment and the amended judgment are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court, when imposing sentence, relied upon reliable information in the presentence report (see People v Haslow, 20 AD3d 680). The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

RIVERA, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Francis, 2021 NY Slip Op 03608, 195 A.D.3d 748, 145 N.Y.S.3d 353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

2021 NY Slip Op 03608 (People v. Francis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Haslow
20 A.D.3d 680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)