People v. Francis

265 A.D.2d 341, 696 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9594
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Francis. Read the opinion of the Court — 253 A.D.2d 704

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered May 27, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly precluded the defendant from using the Grand Jury testimony of the undercover officer to impeach that officer at trial. The Grand Jury minutes demonstrate that the officer was not specifically questioned as to the subject matter that was to be the basis of the impeachment (see, People v Bornholdt, 33 NY2d 75, 88-89, cert denied sub nom. Victory v New York, 416 US 905; People v Gonzalez, 244 AD2d 422, 423).

The remaining claims of prosecutorial misconduct are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Joy, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Francis, 265 A.D.2d 341, 696 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9594 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

265 A.D.2d 341 (People v. Francis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bornholdt
305 N.E.2d 461 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)
People v. Gonzalez
244 A.D.2d 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Victory v. New York
416 U.S. 905 (Supreme Court, 1974)