People v. Francis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Francis

182 A.D.2d 405

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 182 A.D.2d 405 (People v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Francis, 182 A.D.2d 405 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), entered on or about December 19, 1990, granting defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence and statements, unanimously affirmed.

The suppression court specifically concluded that defendant did not consent to a search of his automobile. Its determination, amply supported by the record, will not be disturbed by this court (see, People v Rivera, 121 AD2d 166, 171, affd 68 NY2d 786). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), entered on or about December 19, 1990, granting defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence and statements, unanimously affirmed.

The suppression court specifically concluded that defendant did not consent to a search of his automobile. Its determination, amply supported by the record, will not be disturbed by this court (see, People v Rivera, 121 AD2d 166, 171, affd 68 NY2d 786). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 A.D.2d 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-francis-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack