People v. Francine F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Francine F.

131 A.D.2d 588, 516 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48049

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 131 A.D.2d 588 (People v. Francine F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Francine F., 131 A.D.2d 588, 516 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48049 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two amended judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Amaro, J.), both rendered August 14, 1985, adjudicating her a youthful offender, upon her pleas of guilty of burglary in the second degree (four counts; three counts under indictment No. 1539/84 and one count under indictment No. 1788/84), and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the amended judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from two amended judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Amaro, J.), both rendered August 14, 1985, adjudicating her a youthful offender, upon her pleas of guilty of burglary in the second degree (four counts; three counts under indictment No. 1539/84 and one count under indictment No. 1788/84), and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the amended judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A.D.2d 588, 516 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-francine-f-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack