People v. Francan

129 A.D.3d 987, 10 N.Y.S.3d 445
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 17, 2015·No. 2013-08544·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Warhit, J.), rendered November 19, 2013, convicting him of driving while ability impaired, assault in the third degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and failure to drive on the right half of the roadway, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*988 Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the jury’s verdict was inconsistent is unpreserved for appellate review, as defense counsel failed to object to the alleged inconsistency prior to the discharge of the jury (see People v Satloff, 56 NY2d 745, 746 [1982]).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the evidence was sufficient to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]). Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Francan, 129 A.D.3d 987, 10 N.Y.S.3d 445 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

129 A.D.3d 987 (People v. Francan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Satloff
437 N.E.2d 271 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)