People v. Frampton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Frampton

187 A.D.2d 605, 591 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12974

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 187 A.D.2d 605 (People v. Frampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Frampton, 187 A.D.2d 605, 591 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beerman, J.), both rendered February 13, 1991, convicting him of robbery in the third degree under Indictment No. [606]*6065498/90 and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. N13548/90, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non frivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beerman, J.), both rendered February 13, 1991, convicting him of robbery in the third degree under Indictment No. [606]*6065498/90 and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. N13548/90, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non frivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A.D.2d 605, 591 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-frampton-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack