People v. Foy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Foy

136 A.D.3d 422, 23 N.Y.S.3d 880

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 2016

Docket102 5606/99

StatusPublished

This text of 136 A.D.3d 422 (People v. Foy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Foy, 136 A.D.3d 422, 23 N.Y.S.3d 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered July 12, 2012, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 25 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). We perceive no basis for reducing the term of post-release supervision.

Concur — Saxe, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered July 12, 2012, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 25 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). We perceive no basis for reducing the term of post-release supervision.

Concur — Saxe, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter and Feinman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 A.D.3d 422, 23 N.Y.S.3d 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-foy-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack