People v. Foxworth

2018 NY Slip Op 3702
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 23, 2018
Docket2017-02375
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 3702 (People v. Foxworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Foxworth, 2018 NY Slip Op 3702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Foxworth (2018 NY Slip Op 03702)
People v Foxworth
2018 NY Slip Op 03702
Decided on May 23, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 23, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
RUTH C. BALKIN
SANDRA L. SGROI
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2017-02375
(Ind. No. 2917/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

James Foxworth, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Cynthia Colt of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and William H. Branigan of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorothy Chin-Brandt, J., at plea; Stephanie Zaro, J., at sentence), imposed January 20, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 339-342; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257; cf. People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 145-146). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255-256).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, SGROI, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 3702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-foxworth-nyappdiv-2018.