People v. Fox

202 A.D.2d 1038, 610 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3420

This text of 202 A.D.2d 1038 (People v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Fox, 202 A.D.2d 1038, 610 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record supports the suppression court’s finding that defendant, despite his mild mental retardation, effectively waived his Miranda rights (see, People v Williams, 62 NY2d 285, 287; People v Orlando LL., 188 AD2d 685, lv denied 81 NY2d 845; People v Matthews, 148 AD2d 272, lv dismissed 74 NY2d 950). Defendant’s sentence is neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of On[1039]*1039tario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Rape, 1st Degree.) Present —Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Williams
465 N.E.2d 327 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Matthews
148 A.D.2d 272 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Orlando LL.
188 A.D.2d 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.D.2d 1038, 610 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fox-nyappdiv-1994.