People v. Fountain

114 A.D.3d 491, 979 N.Y.S.2d 810
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Fountain. Read the opinion of the Court — 102 A.D.3d 887

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Roger Hayes, J), entered on or about September 14, 2009, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure to level two (see People v Cintron, 12 NY3d 60, 70 [2009], cert denied 558 US 1011 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 418, 421 [2008]). Defendant’s egregious criminal record, including the underlying sex crime, defendant’s prior sex crimes against children, and his homicide convictions, outweighs the factors he cites in support of a downward departure. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ, Sweeny, Richter, ManzanetDaniels and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fountain, 114 A.D.3d 491, 979 N.Y.S.2d 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

114 A.D.3d 491 (People v. Fountain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Knox
903 N.E.2d 1149 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
In re Kalil
130 S. Ct. 554 (Supreme Court, 2009)