People v. Foster

265 A.D.2d 883, 696 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9989
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Foster. Read the opinion of the Court — 279 A.D.2d 317
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 1, 1999·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of bail jumping in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.57). Because defendant did not move to withdraw the guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, he failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Hill, 254 AD2d 726, lv denied 92 NY2d 1050). Contrary to the contention of defendant, this case does not fall within an exception to the preservation doctrine (see, People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 NY2d 839; People v Lopez, supra, at 666). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Bail Jumping, 1st Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Foster, 265 A.D.2d 883, 696 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9989 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

265 A.D.2d 883 (People v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Toxey
655 N.E.2d 160 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Hill
254 A.D.2d 726 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)