People v. Foster

199 A.D.2d 1063, 608 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12692
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: A reconstruction hearing disclosed that defendant was not present in chambers during a Sandoval conference. The court made a Sandoval ruling in the courtroom immediately before trial, permitting the use of some convictions for cross-examination. Defendant did not testify. Because defendant did not have an opportunity to make "a meaningful contribution”, reversal is required (People v Favor, 82 NY2d 254, 267; see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656). (Resubmission of Appeal from Judgment of Wayne County Court, Sirkin, J.—Assault, 1st Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Foster, 199 A.D.2d 1063, 608 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

199 A.D.2d 1063 (People v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hall
201 A.D.2d 891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)