People v. Foster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Foster

118 A.D.2d 654, 499 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54516

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 118 A.D.2d 654 (People v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Foster, 118 A.D.2d 654, 499 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54516 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinions

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demakos, J.), rendered April 12, 1983, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The trial court did not err in refusing the jury’s request that the summation of the defense counsel be reread, since the [655]*655content of counsel’s summation is not evidence (see, People v Jones, 106 AD2d 585; United States v Guanti, 421 F2d 792, 801, cert denied sub nom. Romano v United States, 400 US 832). The defendant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and are without merit. Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demakos, J.), rendered April 12, 1983, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The trial court did not err in refusing the jury’s request that the summation of the defense counsel be reread, since the [655]*655content of counsel’s summation is not evidence (see, People v Jones, 106 AD2d 585; United States v Guanti, 421 F2d 792, 801, cert denied sub nom. Romano v United States, 400 US 832). The defendant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and are without merit. Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 A.D.2d 654, 499 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-foster-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack