People v. Foster

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Foster

186 N.W.2d 23, 30 Mich. App. 100, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 2166

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 25, 1971

DocketDocket No. 6237

StatusPublished

This text of 186 N.W.2d 23 (People v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Foster, 186 N.W.2d 23, 30 Mich. App. 100, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 2166 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted by a jury for the crime of larceny in a store contrary to MCLA § 750.360 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.592). Defendant was sentenced to a term of two to four years imprisonment. This Court has granted defendant a delayed appeal.

The defendant, Robert Foster, and Mary Kidd were arrested in a department store by a security officer when Mary Kidd attempted to hide articles of clothing under her dress. Originally charged as a co-defendant, Mary Kidd entered a plea of guilty to the charge on October 26, 1967. At the trial of the defendant, the prosecutor, upon request by defense counsel, called Mary Kidd as a res gestae witness. On redirect examination, the prosecutor questioned Mary Kidd concerning a previous criminal conviction.

The sole issue raised on appeal relates to the prosecutor’s questioning the witness regarding her prior criminal conviction. Although timely objection was made by the defense counsel, the trial court allowed the prosecutor’s questioning. The trial judge did, however, instruct the jury that the witness’s prior conviction could be used only for the purpose of testing her credibility.

CL 1948, § 600.2158 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 27 A-.2158), is dispositive of the issue raised by the defendant. Under the authority of this statute, the prosecutor could properly question Mary Kidd regarding prior criminal convictions. People v. Eldridge (1969), 17 Mich App 306, 311.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted by a jury for the crime of larceny in a store contrary to MCLA § 750.360 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.592). Defendant was sentenced to a term of two to four years imprisonment. This Court has granted defendant a delayed appeal.

The defendant, Robert Foster, and Mary Kidd were arrested in a department store by a security officer when Mary Kidd attempted to hide articles of clothing under her dress. Originally charged as a co-defendant, Mary Kidd entered a plea of guilty to the charge on October 26, 1967. At the trial of the defendant, the prosecutor, upon request by defense counsel, called Mary Kidd as a res gestae witness. On redirect examination, the prosecutor questioned Mary Kidd concerning a previous criminal conviction.

The sole issue raised on appeal relates to the prosecutor’s questioning the witness regarding her prior criminal conviction. Although timely objection was made by the defense counsel, the trial court allowed the prosecutor’s questioning. The trial judge did, however, instruct the jury that the witness’s prior conviction could be used only for the purpose of testing her credibility.

CL 1948, § 600.2158 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 27 A-.2158), is dispositive of the issue raised by the defendant. Under the authority of this statute, the prosecutor could properly question Mary Kidd regarding prior criminal convictions. People v. Eldridge (1969), 17 Mich App 306, 311.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 N.W.2d 23, 30 Mich. App. 100, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 2166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-foster-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack