People v. Fortune
This text of 70 A.D.3d 964 (People v. Fortune) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered October 27, 2006, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in precluding the defendant from calling a witness at trial to present certain evidence since the only purpose of the evidence [965]*965would have been to impeach the credibility of the arresting police officers on a collateral matter (see People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233, 247-248 [1987]; People v Fowler, 61 AD3d 698, 698 [2009]; People v Rendon, 301 AD2d 665 [2003]; People v Ragland, 240 AD2d 598 [1997]).
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the prosecutor’s comments during summation did not deprive him of a fair trial, as they were a fair response to the defendant’s attack on the credibility of the police witnesses (see People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396 [1981]; People v Avila, 69 AD3d 642 [2010]; People v Robinson, 63 AD3d 531, 532 [2009]; People v Barnes, 33 AD3d 811 [2006]; People v Vaughn, 209 AD2d 459 [1994]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Santucci, J.P., Dickerson, Chambers and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 A.D.3d 964, 893 N.Y.S.2d 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fortune-nyappdiv-2010.