People v. Fortune

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Fortune

192 N.W.2d 15, 34 Mich. App. 699

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided June 29, 1971·No. Docket No. 9283·Published

Opinion

Donhof, P. J.

The defendant was convicted by a jury of armed robbery, MCLA § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.797). He appeals alleging numerous errors. Timely objections to the alleged errors were not made and therefore absent a miscarriage of justice the issues have not been preserved for appellate review, GCR [700]*7001963, 507.5. An examination of the record discloses no miscarriage of justice.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donhof, P. J.

The defendant was convicted by a jury of armed robbery, MCLA § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.797). He appeals alleging numerous errors. Timely objections to the alleged errors were not made and therefore absent a miscarriage of justice the issues have not been preserved for appellate review, GCR [700]*7001963, 507.5. An examination of the record discloses no miscarriage of justice.

Affirmed.

People v. Fortune, 192 N.W.2d 15, 34 Mich. App. 699 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

192 N.W.2d 15 (People v. Fortune) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related