People v. Fortner

2022 NY Slip Op 01926
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 18, 2022
Docket242 KA 21-00635
StatusPublished

This text of 2022 NY Slip Op 01926 (People v. Fortner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Fortner, 2022 NY Slip Op 01926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Fortner (2022 NY Slip Op 01926)
People v Fortner
2022 NY Slip Op 01926
Decided on March 18, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 18, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

242 KA 21-00635

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

DARRYL FORTNER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)


FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PIOTR BANASIAK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (BRADLEY W. OASTLER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a resentence of the Onondaga County Court (Matthew J. Doran, J.), rendered March 23, 2021. Defendant was resentenced upon a conviction of robbery in the first degree and menacing in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a resentence on his conviction, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]) and menacing in the second degree

(§ 120.14 [1]). In appeal No. 2, defendant appeals from a resentence on his conviction, upon his plea of guilty in the same plea proceeding, of attempted robbery in the first degree (§§ 110.00, 160.15 [4]). Although defendant validly waived his right to appeal at the plea proceeding (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), that waiver does not preclude him from challenging the sentences imposed upon resentencing (see People v Allen, 97 AD3d 1164, 1164 [4th Dept 2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 994 [2012]; People v Gray, 32 AD3d 1052, 1053 [3d Dept 2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 902 [2006]; see also People v Jirdon, 159 AD3d 1518, 1519 [4th Dept 2018]). We nevertheless conclude in each appeal that the resentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: March 18, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 NY Slip Op 01926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fortner-nyappdiv-2022.