People v. Fortner

78 A.D.2d 661, 432 N.Y.S.2d 222, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13157
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 14, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 A.D.2d 661 (People v. Fortner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Fortner, 78 A.D.2d 661, 432 N.Y.S.2d 222, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 22, 1977, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) a judgment of the same court, rendered July 26, 1978 nunc pro tunc August 22, 1977, as amended by a resentence imposed January 28, 1980, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment rendered August 22, 1977 reversed, on the law, and the second count of the indictment charging criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree is dismissed. Judgment rendered July 26, 1978 as amended January 28, 1980, affirmed. Defendant’s active involvement in the presale narcotics negotiations, offering a taste, indicating his ability to sell the narcotics, quoting a price and ultimately taking the undercover officer and informant to his cohort who actually sold the drugs, more than adequately established his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree as an accomplice of the seller. However, on the facts of this case, defendant could not have committed criminal .sale of a controlled substance in the second degree without also having committed criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. The latter is an inclusory concurrent count of the former and must be dismissed (CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]; People v Lee, 39 NY2d 388). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Asselin
138 A.D.2d 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 A.D.2d 661, 432 N.Y.S.2d 222, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fortner-nyappdiv-1980.