People v. Fort

133 A.D.2d 544, 519 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50064
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Fort. Read the opinion of the Court — 145 A.D.2d 983

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and the facts, defendant’s motion to suppress granted, and matter remitted to Onondaga County Su[545]*545preme Court, for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: As in the prior appeal by a codefendant (see, People v Rivers, 129 AD2d 983), we reverse defendant’s judgment and grant his motion to suppress because the police lacked legal justification to stop the vehicle in which defendant was riding. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J. — burglary, second degree, and other offenses.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fort, 133 A.D.2d 544, 519 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

133 A.D.2d 544 (People v. Fort) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rivers
129 A.D.2d 983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)