People v. Forster

Appellate Court of Illinois

People v. Forster

204 Ill. App. 338

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 12, 1917

DocketGen. No. 22,687

StatusPublished

This text of 204 Ill. App. 338 (People v. Forster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Forster, 204 Ill. App. 338 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Criminal law, § 526*—when errors are harmless. The record in a prosecution for conspiracy held to disclose no prejudicial error in the admission or rejection of evidence nor any prejudicial remarks of the court or counsel, where the evidence as to defendants guilt was very convincing. 3. Criminal law, § 491*—what points and arguments may not he made in petition for rehearing. New points and new arguments are of no avail in a petition for rehearing in a criminal case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Criminal law, § 526*—when errors are harmless. The record in a prosecution for conspiracy held to disclose no prejudicial error in the admission or rejection of evidence nor any prejudicial remarks of the court or counsel, where the evidence as to defendants guilt was very convincing. 3. Criminal law, § 491*—what points and arguments may not he made in petition for rehearing. New points and new arguments are of no avail in a petition for rehearing in a criminal case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 Ill. App. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-forster-illappct-1917.