People v. Ford
This text of 91 A.D.3d 968 (People v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[969]*969The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was pursuant to CPL 330.30 to set aside the verdict on the ground that the People failed to disclose, or failed timely to disclose, Brady material (see Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83 [1963]).
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not deprived of his right to the effective assistance of counsel under either the United States Constitution or the New York Constitution (see Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]).
The Supreme Court properly adjudicated the defendant a persistent violent felony offender (see Penal Law § 70.04 [1] [b]; § 70.08 [1]). Skelos, J.P, Dickerson, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A.D.3d 968, 937 N.Y.2d 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ford-nyappdiv-2012.