People v. Ford

188 A.D.2d 613
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 1992·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Pano Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered June 20, 1991, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ford, 188 A.D.2d 613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

188 A.D.2d 613 (People v. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ford
296 A.D.2d 420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Zanghi
256 A.D.2d 1120 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Grays
237 A.D.2d 303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)