People v. Foote

280 A.D.2d 991, 720 N.Y.S.2d 422, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1135
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2001·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court erred in failing to grant him youthful offender status (see, People v Wright, 269 AD2d 829, lv denied 94 NY2d 946, 950, 954; People v King, 254 AD2d 814, 814-815, lv denied 92 NY2d 983), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Because the court imposed the minimum sentence authorized for a class B violent felony offense (see, Penal Law § 70.02 [3] [a]), there is no basis for the exercise of our authority to reduce the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, People v Marrero, 278 AD2d 135; People v Agha, 239 AD2d 930, 931, lv denied 90 NY2d 854). (Appeal from Judgment of Wayne County Court, Sirkin, J. — Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hayes, Burns and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Foote, 280 A.D.2d 991, 720 N.Y.S.2d 422, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

280 A.D.2d 991 (People v. Foote) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Henderson
300 A.D.2d 1119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Muller
294 A.D.2d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Carson
292 A.D.2d 461 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Grant
288 A.D.2d 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)