People v. Fontanez

200 A.D.2d 585, 608 N.Y.S.2d 848

This text of 200 A.D.2d 585 (People v. Fontanez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Fontanez, 200 A.D.2d 585, 608 N.Y.S.2d 848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), rendered October 9, 1990, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Dickerson, 163 AD2d 610). We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se brief, and conclude that they are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 A.D.2d 585, 608 N.Y.S.2d 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fontanez-nyappdiv-1994.