People v. Foley

259 A.D.2d 629, 684 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2449
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Foley. Read the opinion of the Court — 258 A.D.2d 243

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered May 21, 1997, convicting her of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, the elements of burglary in the second degree, including that the defendant had the contemporaneous intent to commit a crime when she entered the apartment (see, People v Konikov, 160 AD2d 146, 149).

[630]*630The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. S. Miller, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Foley, 259 A.D.2d 629, 684 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2449 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

259 A.D.2d 629 (People v. Foley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Konikov
160 A.D.2d 146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)