People v. Foley

729 N.E.2d 1148, 94 N.Y.2d 928, 708 N.Y.S.2d 349, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 511
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 4, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 729 N.E.2d 1148 (People v. Foley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Foley, 729 N.E.2d 1148, 94 N.Y.2d 928, 708 N.Y.S.2d 349, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 511 (N.Y. 2000).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence was legally sufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, the elements of burglary in the second degree, including that defendant had the contemporaneous intent to commit a crime when she entered the apartment. Defendant’s remaining arguments are unpreserved.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Jesus
38 A.D.3d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Murray
278 A.D.2d 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
729 N.E.2d 1148, 94 N.Y.2d 928, 708 N.Y.S.2d 349, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-foley-ny-2000.