People v. Fogle

104 A.D.3d 873, 960 N.Y.S.2d 653
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 20, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 104 A.D.3d 873 (People v. Fogle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Fogle, 104 A.D.3d 873, 960 N.Y.S.2d 653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), rendered May 5, 2007, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of due process of law because the People served him with a notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 at his arraignment on the felony complaint [874]*874in the Criminal Court, Queens County, rather than at his subsequent arraignment on the indictment in the Supreme Court, Queens County, is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Vasquez, 87 AD3d 1042, 1043 [2011]). In any event, his contention is without merit (see People v Shoukron, 234 AD2d 400 [1996]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Dillon, J.E, Balkin, Dickerson and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Peters
2024 NY Slip Op 50323(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 A.D.3d 873, 960 N.Y.S.2d 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fogle-nyappdiv-2013.