People v. Fofanah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fofanah

263 A.D.2d 492, 691 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7863

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D.2d 492 (People v. Fofanah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fofanah, 263 A.D.2d 492, 691 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Robinson, J.), rendered December 6, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Katz, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the police stop of the defendant’s car was based on reasonable suspicion (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759; People v Dixon, 52 AD2d 928; People v Bianchi, 208 AD2d 551, affd 85 NY2d 1022). Altman, J. P., Friedmann, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Robinson, J.), rendered December 6, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Katz, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the police stop of the defendant’s car was based on reasonable suspicion (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759; People v Dixon, 52 AD2d 928; People v Bianchi, 208 AD2d 551, affd 85 NY2d 1022). Altman, J. P., Friedmann, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D.2d 492, 691 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fofanah-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack