People v. Fluff
This text of 58 A.D.2d 1023 (People v. Fluff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, insofar as it imposes sentence, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion, in the interest of justice, to an indeterminate sentence having a minimum of three years and a maximum of six years, and otherwise, judgment affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of unlawfully selling .81 ounces of marijuana in violation of section 220.34 (subd 1, par [c]) of the Penal Law, a class C felony and sentenced as a second felony offender to an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment having a minimum term of four years and a maximum term of eight years. Prior to the trial he had withdrawn his earlier guilty plea to a reduced attempted possession charge, a class E felony, which the court had accepted with an indication that the minimum sentence allowable under section 70.06 of the Penal Law would be imposed (an indeterminate sentence having a minimum of one and one-half years and a maximum of three years). Under all the circumstances, the sentence should be reduced in the interest of justice to the minimum permitted for a class C felony conviction under section 70.06 of the Penal Law (an indeterminate sentence having a minimum of three years and a maximum of six years). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Supreme Court—criminal sale controlled substance, fifth degree.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Denman and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 A.D.2d 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fluff-nyappdiv-1977.