People v. Fludd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fludd

30 A.D.2d 814, 293 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3529

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 814 (People v. Fludd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fludd, 30 A.D.2d 814, 293 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered October 16, 1967, convicting him of a violation of section 43 of the Penal Law, on his guilty plea, and suspending sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and indictment dismissed pursuant to section 668 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In our opinion, defendant’s [815]*815motion to dismiss the indictment for delay in prosecution, made before his plea of guilty, should have been granted (People v. Winfrey, 20 N Y 2d 138; People v. Masselli, 11 A D 2d 722). Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur; Beldock, P. J., concurs in the result, with the following memorandum: Although I adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting memorandum in People v. Sylvester (29 A D 2d 985), nevertheless, I am constrained to concur by reason of the decision in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered October 16, 1967, convicting him of a violation of section 43 of the Penal Law, on his guilty plea, and suspending sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and indictment dismissed pursuant to section 668 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In our opinion, defendant’s [815]*815motion to dismiss the indictment for delay in prosecution, made before his plea of guilty, should have been granted (People v. Winfrey, 20 N Y 2d 138; People v. Masselli, 11 A D 2d 722). Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur; Beldock, P. J., concurs in the result, with the following memorandum: Although I adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting memorandum in People v. Sylvester (29 A D 2d 985), nevertheless, I am constrained to concur by reason of the decision in that case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 814, 293 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fludd-nyappdiv-1968.