People v. Flowers

20 A.D.3d 488, 797 N.Y.S.2d 762
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 11, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 A.D.3d 488 (People v. Flowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Flowers, 20 A.D.3d 488, 797 N.Y.S.2d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered March 25, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

. The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Flowers
72 A.D.3d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 A.D.3d 488, 797 N.Y.S.2d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-flowers-nyappdiv-2005.