People v. Flowers

20 A.D.3d 488, 797 N.Y.S.2d 762
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 11, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered March 25, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

. The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Flowers, 20 A.D.3d 488, 797 N.Y.S.2d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

20 A.D.3d 488 (People v. Flowers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Flowers
72 A.D.3d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)