People v. Floryan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Floryan

278 A.D.2d 336, 718 N.Y.S.2d 602, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12870

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 336 (People v. Floryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Floryan, 278 A.D.2d 336, 718 N.Y.S.2d 602, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered August 4, 1999, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that she had violated a condition thereof, and imposing sentence upon her previous convictions of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as a misdemeanor, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which [337]*337could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., S. Miller, McGinity, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered August 4, 1999, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that she had violated a condition thereof, and imposing sentence upon her previous convictions of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as a misdemeanor, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which [337]*337could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., S. Miller, McGinity, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 336, 718 N.Y.S.2d 602, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-floryan-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack