People v. Florival

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Florival

262 A.D.2d 499, 691 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6595

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 262 A.D.2d 499 (People v. Florival) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Florival, 262 A.D.2d 499, 691 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6595 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), rendered November 25, 1996, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[500]*500Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), the record established that the defense of justification was disproved beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Desmond, 125 AD2d 585). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. S. Miller, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), rendered November 25, 1996, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[500]*500Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), the record established that the defense of justification was disproved beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Desmond, 125 AD2d 585). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. S. Miller, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 499, 691 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-florival-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack