People v. Florio

125 A.D.3d 451, 999 N.Y.S.2d 741
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 2015·No. 14163 6115/99·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered March 2, 2012, resentencing defendant to a term of 15 years, with 2V2 years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

There was no unreasonable delay in resentencing defendant for the purpose of adding a term of postrelease supervision (see People v Williams, 14 NY3d 198, 213 [2010]). “[E]ven assuming that CPL 380.30 applies, there was no violation of the statute because defendant [ ] [was] resentenced within a reasonable time after DOCS notified the courts that [he was a] ‘designated person[ ]’ under Correction Law § 601-d” (id.). There is nothing in Williams, nor in any other authority, to suggest that the delay should be measured from the date that the Court of Appeals decided People v Sparber (10 NY3d 457 [2008]), which rendered resentencing necessary. Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Feinman, Clark and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Florio, 125 A.D.3d 451, 999 N.Y.S.2d 741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

125 A.D.3d 451 (People v. Florio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Polite
2018 NY Slip Op 6118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Perez
133 A.D.3d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)