People v. Florio
This text of 125 A.D.3d 451 (People v. Florio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered March 2, 2012, resentencing defendant to a term of 15 years, with 2V2 years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.
There was no unreasonable delay in resentencing defendant for the purpose of adding a term of postrelease supervision (see People v Williams, 14 NY3d 198, 213 [2010]). “[E]ven assuming that CPL 380.30 applies, there was no violation of the statute because defendant [ ] [was] resentenced within a reasonable time after DOCS notified the courts that [he was a] ‘designated person[ ]’ under Correction Law § 601-d” (id.). There is nothing in Williams, nor in any other authority, to suggest that the delay should be measured from the date that the Court of Appeals decided People v Sparber (10 NY3d 457 [2008]), which rendered resentencing necessary. Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Feinman, Clark and Kapnick, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 A.D.3d 451, 999 N.Y.S.2d 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-florio-nyappdiv-2015.