People v. Flores

46 A.D.3d 302, 846 N.Y.S.2d 574
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Flores. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 A.D.3d 876

Opinion

Order, [303]*303Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), entered on or about June 9, 2006, which denied defendant’s motion to be resentenced pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005, unanimously affirmed.

The court correctly denied defendant’s motion since he was less than three years from his parole eligibility date when he filed the motion (see People v Bautista, 26 AD3d 230 [2006], appeal dismissed 7 NY3d 838 [2006]). Since defendant was clearly ineligible, as a matter of law, for resentencing, there was no reason for the court to assign counsel or conduct a hearing (see People v Santana, 44 AD3d 340 [2007]). Concur—Marlow, J.P, Nardelli, Williams and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Flores, 46 A.D.3d 302, 846 N.Y.S.2d 574 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

46 A.D.3d 302 (People v. Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bautista
857 N.E.2d 49 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bautista
26 A.D.3d 230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Santana
44 A.D.3d 340 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)