People v. Flores

181 A.D.2d 550, 581 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3792, 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 912
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Flores. Read the opinion of the Court — 153 A.D.2d 585

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert I. Altman, J.), rendered September [551]*5514, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him as a predicate felony officer to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Upon an independent review of the facts, we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Defendant has not demonstrated that the jury failed to accord the evidence its proper weight, and the jury was entitled to reject defendant’s account of the incident. (People v Siu Wah Tse, 91 AD2d 350, 352.) Defendant’s argument that comments made by the prosecutor during summation deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved (CPL 470.05 [2]), and, in any event, without merit (People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Flores, 181 A.D.2d 550, 581 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3792, 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

181 A.D.2d 550 (People v. Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Galloway
430 N.E.2d 885 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Siu Wah Tse
91 A.D.2d 350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)