People v. Flores

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Flores

111 A.D.2d 407, 489 N.Y.S.2d 372, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51495

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 28, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.D.2d 407 (People v. Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Flores, 111 A.D.2d 407, 489 N.Y.S.2d 372, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), rendered August 25, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The evidence adduced at trial, which included proof that defendant was apprehended by the police while fleeing from the complainant’s apartment, in possession of property stolen from the complainant’s apartment, was sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant committed the crimes of which he was convicted (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be unpreserved or without merit. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), rendered August 25, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The evidence adduced at trial, which included proof that defendant was apprehended by the police while fleeing from the complainant’s apartment, in possession of property stolen from the complainant’s apartment, was sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant committed the crimes of which he was convicted (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be unpreserved or without merit. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.2d 407, 489 N.Y.S.2d 372, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-flores-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack