People v. Fletcher

2017 NY Slip Op 9065, 156 A.D.3d 1469, 65 N.Y.S.3d 871
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Fletcher. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 A.D.3d 1063
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2017·No. 1479 KA 16-00446·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered July 28, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]), defendant contends that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe. We reject that contention. Defendant received the benefit of an advantageous plea agreement in which he pleaded guilty to one count in satisfaction of several pending cases and, despite being rearrested prior to sentencing in violation of County Court’s warning, he nonetheless received a lesser sentence than the four-year term of incarceration in the original plea agreement.

Present—Whalen, P.J., Smith, Garni, Troutman and Winslow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fletcher, 2017 NY Slip Op 9065, 156 A.D.3d 1469, 65 N.Y.S.3d 871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 9065 (People v. Fletcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 220.16
New York PEN § 220.16