People v. Fletcher

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Fletcher

58 N.E.3d 1111, 27 N.Y.3d 1177

New York Court of Appeals·Decided August 25, 2016·Published·Cited by 29 cases

Opinion

[1178]*1178OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Whether the circumstances of this particular case gave rise to reasonable suspicion presents a mixed question of law and fact that is beyond our review if there is support in the record for the determination (see People v William, 19 NY3d 891, 893 [2012]; People v Pines, 99 NY2d 525, 527 [2002]). Here, such record support exists. Defendant’s remaining argument has been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1178]*1178OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Whether the circumstances of this particular case gave rise to reasonable suspicion presents a mixed question of law and fact that is beyond our review if there is support in the record for the determination (see People v William, 19 NY3d 891, 893 [2012]; People v Pines, 99 NY2d 525, 527 [2002]). Here, such record support exists. Defendant’s remaining argument has been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

People v. Fletcher, 58 N.E.3d 1111, 27 N.Y.3d 1177 (N.Y. 2016).

Pincite

58 N.E.3d 1111 (People v. Fletcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related