People v. Flemming

2025 NY Slip Op 07189
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 2025
Docket938 KA 23-00683
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 07189 (People v. Flemming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Flemming, 2025 NY Slip Op 07189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Flemming (2025 NY Slip Op 07189)
People v Flemming
2025 NY Slip Op 07189
Decided on December 23, 2025
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 23, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: MONTOUR, J.P., SMITH, OGDEN, GREENWOOD, AND DELCONTE, JJ.

938 KA 23-00683

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

JACQUEE D. FLEMMING, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


JULIE CIANCA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (REZVANEH GANJI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MERIDETH H. SMITH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Judith A. Sinclair, J.), rendered February 21, 2023. The judgment revoked defendant's sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation previously imposed upon his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment, followed by a period of postrelease supervision.

Initially, we note that even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal during the underlying plea proceeding was valid, it would not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence imposed following his violation of probation (see People v Kibler, 187 AD3d 1569, 1569 [4th Dept 2020]; People v White [appeal No. 2], 173 AD3d 1852, 1852 [4th Dept 2019]). We conclude, however, that the sentence imposed upon defendant's violation of probation is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: December 23, 2025

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Kibler
2020 NY Slip Op 05365 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 07189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-flemming-nyappdiv-2025.