People v. Fleming
113 A.D.3d 875, 978 N.Y.2d 904
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Fleming. Read the opinion of the Court — 141 A.D.3d 408 →
Opinion
As the defendant correctly contends, he did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]) and, thus, review of his excessive sentence claim is not precluded. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Mastro, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Fleming, 113 A.D.3d 875, 978 N.Y.2d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
113 A.D.3d 875 (People v. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)