People v. Fleischman

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Fleischman

180 N.E.2d 433, 10 N.Y.2d 1025

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 11, 1962

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 N.E.2d 433 (People v. Fleischman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fleischman, 180 N.E.2d 433, 10 N.Y.2d 1025 (N.Y. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed upon the single ground that under the circumstances the trial court committed reversible error in denying defendant’s motion for further cross-examination of prosecution witnesses. As to the other ground stated by the Appellate Division for reversal, we disagree and hold that the testimony of witness Van den Heuvel was admissible (People v. Marrin, 205 N. Y. 275; People v. Dales, 309 N. Y. 97). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed upon the single ground that under the circumstances the trial court committed reversible error in denying defendant’s motion for further cross-examination of prosecution witnesses. As to the other ground stated by the Appellate Division for reversal, we disagree and hold that the testimony of witness Van den Heuvel was admissible (People v. Marrin, 205 N. Y. 275; People v. Dales, 309 N. Y. 97). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 N.E.2d 433, 10 N.Y.2d 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fleischman-ny-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack