People v. Flegenheimer
This text of 15 N.Y. St. Rep. 376 (People v. Flegenheimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
You must show that at the time of the trial the complainant was in court with his witnesses, or that he was only notified to be present, but purposely remained away.
A general certificate, giving no facts, but merely expressing a conclusion that the public lost no rights, has never been considered by this court sufficient to warrant our discharging the judgment.
When all the facts are laid before us, so that we can see that the accused did not escape conviction through the absence of prosecutor and witnesses, we are in position to cancel the judgment, but not before.
Leave given to renew the application on new papers.
Certified copies of the recognizance and of the order forfeiting it, must also be submitted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 N.Y. St. Rep. 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-flegenheimer-nyctcompl-1888.