People v. Fitzsimmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fitzsimmons

4 A.D.3d 743, 771 N.Y.S.2d 478, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1428

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.D.3d 743 (People v. Fitzsimmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fitzsimmons, 4 A.D.3d 743, 771 N.Y.S.2d 478, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1428 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

from a resentence of the Oneida County Court (Barry Donalty, J.), rendered October 1, 2001. Defendant was resentenced following his conviction, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the resentence so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a resentence following his conviction upon his plea of guilty of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.65 [3]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his present challenge to the resentence (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that challenge as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see 470.15 [6] [a]). “Because the resentence occurred more than 30 days after the original sentence, defendant may not now appeal from the judgment, but only from the resentence” (People v Ferrin, 197 AD2d 882, 882 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 849 [1993]; see CPL 450.30 [3]). In any event, had defendant’s remaining contentions been properly before us, we would affirm. Present—Pine, J.E, Wisner, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

from a resentence of the Oneida County Court (Barry Donalty, J.), rendered October 1, 2001. Defendant was resentenced following his conviction, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the resentence so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a resentence following his conviction upon his plea of guilty of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.65 [3]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his present challenge to the resentence (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that challenge as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see 470.15 [6] [a]). “Because the resentence occurred more than 30 days after the original sentence, defendant may not now appeal from the judgment, but only from the resentence” (People v Ferrin, 197 AD2d 882, 882 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 849 [1993]; see CPL 450.30 [3]). In any event, had defendant’s remaining contentions been properly before us, we would affirm. Present—Pine, J.E, Wisner, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.3d 743, 771 N.Y.S.2d 478, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fitzsimmons-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack